What is the core claim of dualist theories in the philosophy of mind?
Minds exist independently of physical bodies or cannot be fully reduced to physical processes.
A look at the major forms and concepts arising from the assertion of mind-body distinction.
René Descartes provided the classical defense for Substance Dualism through two primary lines of reasoning.
The Category Mistake: Gilbert Ryle's critique states that Dualism commits a category mistake by treating the mind as a thing separate from body actions, but actually ‘mind’ refers to patterns of behaviour and dispositions.
A fundamental issue faced by Dualism is explaining the causal link between non-physical and physical substances.
This theory holds the mind is caused by the body but cannot causally affect it—a position that presents significant difficulties.
What is the core claim of dualist theories in the philosophy of mind?
Minds exist independently of physical bodies or cannot be fully reduced to physical processes.
What does substance dualism assert?
Minds and bodies are two distinct kinds of substances; the mind is a non-physical substance.
What is Descartes' indivisibility argument?
Minds are indivisible while bodies are divisible, so mind and body are distinct substances.
What is a common criticism of the indivisibility argument?
Some mental capacities can fail independently, suggesting the mind may be divisible in some sense.
What is Descartes' conceivability argument?
Since the mind can be conceived to exist without the body, they must be distinct substances.
What is property dualism?
While there is one physical substance, some mental properties are irreducible to physical properties.
What is the philosophical zombies argument?
Conceivable beings physically identical to humans but lacking consciousness imply mental properties are non-physical.
What is the knowledge argument by Frank Jackson?
Mary, knowing all physical facts about color but never experiencing it, learns something new when seeing color for the first time.
What is the problem of other minds in dualism?
It questions how we can know other minds exist if minds are non-physical and inaccessible.
What is Gilbert Ryle's critique of dualism?
Dualism makes a category mistake by treating mind as a separate thing rather than patterns of behavior.
What is the conceptual interaction problem for interactionist dualism?
How can an immaterial mind affect a physical body without breaking physical laws?
What challenge does epiphenomenalism face regarding mental causation?
It cannot explain how we have introspective self-knowledge or why mental states would evolve if causally inert.