What was the aim of Bartlett’s "War of the Ghosts" study?
To investigate how memory is influenced by prior knowledge and cultural expectations (schemas), demonstrating reconstructive memory.
TWO KEY STUDIES HELP ILLUSTRATE IMPORTANT THEORIES AND FEATURES OF MEMORY: BARTLETT’S (1932) ‘WAR OF THE GHOSTS’ AND PETERSON AND PETERSON’S (1959) STUDY ON STM DURATION.
Conclusion on STM: The study confirmed STM’s fragile, short-lived nature, providing clear support for the theoretical distinction of STM as a separate store.
What was the aim of Bartlett’s "War of the Ghosts" study?
To investigate how memory is influenced by prior knowledge and cultural expectations (schemas), demonstrating reconstructive memory.
What procedure did Bartlett use in his study?
Participants read a Native American folk story and recalled it multiple times over varying intervals.
What were Bartlett’s key findings?
Participants’ memories became shorter, simpler, and conformed more to their own cultural schemas over time.
What conclusion did Bartlett draw about memory?
Memory is active and reconstructive, influenced by prior knowledge and prone to distortion.
What was a major strength of Bartlett’s study?
It demonstrated the role of schemas and challenged passive views of memory.
What was a main weakness of Bartlett’s study?
It lacked experimental control and had limited generalizability.
What did Peterson and Peterson aim to study?
The duration of information in short-term memory without rehearsal.
What was the procedure of Peterson and Peterson’s study?
Participants memorized nonsense trigrams and counted backwards to prevent rehearsal before recalling the trigram.
What did Peterson and Peterson find about STM duration?
Recall declined sharply, nearing zero by 18 seconds without rehearsal.
What conclusion did they reach about short-term memory?
STM duration is limited to about 18-30 seconds without rehearsal.
What is a strength of Peterson and Peterson’s study?
It used controlled experimental methods, showing clear cause-effect for STM duration.
What is a weakness of their study?
The use of artificial stimuli limits ecological validity.