What are the three personality dimensions in Eysenck’s theory?
Extraversion, Neuroticism, Psychoticism
Many psychological theories have been proposed to explain why people engage in offending behaviour. These theories focus on individual differences in personality, cognitive processes, moral development, and social learning.
Hans Eysenck argued that offending behaviour is more likely when a person has certain personality traits combined with environmental factors.
These are biased or faulty thinking patterns that help offenders justify or excuse their criminal behavior.
Sutherland's Argument: Criminal behaviour is learned through interaction with others, specifically close friends, family, or peer groups. Learning occurs through communication and imitation.
What are the three personality dimensions in Eysenck’s theory?
Extraversion, Neuroticism, Psychoticism
According to Eysenck, which personality traits are common in criminals?
High extraversion, high neuroticism, and high psychoticism
What biological basis does Eysenck suggest for extraverts?
Underactive nervous system leading to sensation-seeking behavior
How does Eysenck explain the failure to learn socially acceptable behaviour?
High extraversion and neuroticism reduce responsiveness to conditioning and punishment
What does Kohlberg’s theory of moral development suggest about offenders?
Offenders often have immature moral reasoning, usually at the pre-conventional level
Define "hostile attribution bias."
The tendency to interpret ambiguous social cues as hostile or threatening
What is minimalisation in cognitive distortions?
Downplaying or denying the seriousness of a crime
According to differential association theory, how is criminal behaviour learned?
Through social interaction and exposure to pro-criminal attitudes
What factors influence learning criminal behaviour in differential association theory?
Frequency, intensity, and duration of exposure to criminal attitudes
Name one criticism of Eysenck’s theory.
It oversimplifies crime and neglects social factors
Why is differential association theory criticized?
It doesn’t explain why some exposed individuals do not offend